Blog

According to the Constitutional Court, shared custody of a minor child by both parents is generally an appropriate solution in terms of unavoidable interference with the constitutionally guaranteed rights of parents and their minor children.

On March 31, 2022, the Supreme Court posted on the electronic bulletin board a judgement Case No. 23 Cdo 1001/2021, in which it addressed the validity of the parties' contractual arrangements using verbal expressions in a contract that usually express legal presumptions or legal fictions (e.g., „it is considered,“ „it is to be considered,“ "it is understood that," etc.).

On Friday, 11 March, the Chamber of Deputies approved a bill that will, among other things, allow refugees from Ukraine to work on the basis of a special visa under temporary protection.

Parmi les nombreux changements intervenus dans le domaine de la sécurité sociale avec effet au 1er janvier 2022 figurent notamment des ajustements de la durée du congé de paternité et de la rémunération des accueillants familiaux.

In its ruling of 15 November 2021, Case No. II ÚS 2925/20, the Constitutional Court addressed the question whether the principle of equality is violated in a situation where an injury to an employee's health is compensated as an accident at work under the Labour Code (Section 271c of the Labour Code) and not under general civil law (Section 2958 of the Civil Code).

The Building Authority for Prague 1 made a crucial decision in July 2021 when it imposed a fine of CZK 20 000 on a landlord who offered his apartments to tourists for short-term rentals.

Between 28 October 2021 and 28 January 2022, people under the distraint will have a unique opportunity to pay their debt once and for all.

In its judgment of 8 September 2021, file no. I. ÚS 1081/20, Constitutional Court resolved a complaint concerning the determination of contact of grandparents with a minor child.

The Supreme Court's judgment in May, Case No. 27 Cdo 3549/2020, was literally ground-breaking.

In its judgment of 21 May 2021, Case No. II ÚS 1889/19, the Constitutional Court resolved the question of the validity of withdrawal from a competition clause (CC) without giving a reason.